Wade decision, which imposed abortion on demand across the country.Īs reported by Politico, the opinion is “a full-throated, unflinching repudiation of the 1973 decision." Supreme Court has voted to overturn its nearly 50-year-old Roe v.
SIGN this petition urging the Chief Justice and all the Associate Justices to PUBLISH the decision to overturn Roe now!ĭon't allow pro-abortion leftists to pressure Supreme Court justices to change their vote to overturn Roe!Īccording to an initial leaked draft majority opinion allegedly written by Justice Samuel Alito and obtained by Politico, the U.S. LifeSiteNews reached out to Gwynn for comment but is yet to receive a response. Others pointed out that “if a conservative said the same thing about Sotomayor and Keegan they would be banned from Twitter for threatening speech.” “How are not against twitter Terms of Service? And why did you delete them then if they’re not?” asked user Rebecca downs. Shadyhugs, MD, PhD, Esquire May 5, 2022 This was no “thought experiment.” This was exactly what it appeared to be: wishful thinking on a public forum in hopes of putting the idea in someone’s mind and that they might act on it.
“This was exactly what it appeared to be: wishful thinking on a public forum in hopes of putting the idea in someone’s mind and that they might act on it.” This was no “thought experiment,” tweeted user Shadyhugs, MD, PhD, Esquire. “I’d be curious where you think a good place would be to hypothesize the murder of two US Supreme Court justices?” asked user Andy. Many users debunked Gwynn’s attempt to justify himself. In a comment to his own tweet, Gwynn then added that “Twitter is not often a good place for. I’ve removed my recent two tweets about the US Supreme Court as on reflection they’re obviously pretty irresponsible, though I don’t think they would be against Twitter’s TOS.įYI I don’t endorse murdering anyone, but don’t think there’s anything wrong with thought experiments. “FYI, I don’t endorse murdering anyone, but don’t think there’s anything wrong with thought experiments.” Supreme Court as on reflection they’re obviously pretty irresponsible, though I don’t think they would be against Twitter’s Terms of Service,” Gwynn tweeted. “I’ve removed my recent two tweets about the U.S. He also denied that they were against the Twitter Terms of Service. Gwynn later removed both tweets, describing them as “pretty irresponsible,” while dismissing accusations from other users that the tweets amounted to incitement to violence or death threats. His tweets generated huge backlash from other Twitter users who accused him of incitement to violence and flagged his tweets to the FBI and Twitter. Wade, which imposed abortion on demand across the U.S. Gwynn’s comments came after a Monday leak revealed a draft majority opinion by Supreme Court justices to overturn Roe v. Gwynn’s Twitter account is “verified,” meaning that the Big Tech company deems his account to be authentic, “notable,” and “an account of public interest.” The freelance copyrighter from Sheffield, England, then used the self-contradicting argument that the murder of the two justices and the killing of babies could “save many women’s lives in the future.” Screenshot of the now deleted tweets In another tweet, Gwynn claimed his question was an “abstract” one but added that it “becomes a real conundrum if you’re terminally ill and have little to lose yourself.” Gwynn described his question as “an interesting real life trolley problem in America now,” in reference to the thought experiment in ethics in which an onlooker has the choice to save five people in danger of being hit by a trolley, by diverting the trolley to kill just one person, as defined in Merriam-Webster.
“If you had the chance to kill Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito, the two oldest right wing Supreme Court judges, should you do it while Biden can get his nominees to replace them confirmed?” tweeted user Simon Gwynn on Tuesday. ( LifeSiteNews ) - A British Twitter user has suggested murdering pro-life Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito in two separate tweets before removing them.
0 kommentar(er)
